U.S. military administration's malaria control activities (1945-1948).
نویسنده
چکیده
To prevent and control infectious diseases was one of the major concerns of U.S. military government when they stationed in Korea in 1945. It was because the spread of various infectious diseases can cause social unrest and they can also affect the U.S. military. Malaria was one of the most important infectious diseases to which the U.S. military had been paying special attention. The U.S. military received a severe damage during the Pacific war with Japan due to malaria. It was said that more soldiers were lost by malaria than by battle itself. The bitter experience they had during the war made them accumulate more systematic and practical knowledge against malaria. As a result, by the end of the war, the U.S. military could run more than hundreds of units specialized in controlling malaria. Thanks to such a preparation, they could immediately begin their anti-malaria activities in Korea soon after the World War II. Although the vivax malaria, which is the dominant type in Korea, is not as much a fatal type as that in the Pacific areas, it was damaging enough to the infected. The 207th Malaria Survey Detachment carried out collecting and identifying the kinds of mosquitos in Korea. In addition, they also surveyed the prevalence of malaria among school children in Seoul. In terms of controlling malaria, DDT played a decisive role. Vector control is the most effective and ideal measurements against malaria. Before the development of DDT, it was practically impossible to eradicate mosquitos which arise from extremely broad areas. However, DDT could not be used as it had been expected in the rural area, because spraying DDT in the rice paddies which is the breeding place of mosquitos kills rice. Despite such a limitation in anti-malaria activities of the US military government, it should be noted that a significant turn in controlling malaria was possible thanks to the development of DDT.
منابع مشابه
The role of the United States military in the development of vector control products, including insect repellents, insecticides, and bed nets.
Arthropod-borne diseases such as malaria, dengue, scrub typhus, and leishmaniasis continue to pose a significant threat to U.S. military forces deployed in support of operational and humanitarian missions. These diseases are transmitted by a variety of arthropods, including mosquitoes, ticks, chiggers, sand flies, and biting midges. In addition to disease threats, biting arthropods can cause de...
متن کاملDichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT): a weapon missing from the U.S. Department of Defense's Vector Control Arsenal.
Per the National Academy of Sciences: “To only a few chemicals does man owe as great a debt as to DDT.” That same committee concluded that in less than two decades of use, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) had prevented 500 million deaths from malaria. So, what has been the history of DDT use by the U.S. military? How did a chemical with such an amazing ability to halt the spread of disease...
متن کاملAntibacterial Substances Separated from Plants.
Interest is arising in the possible use of higher plants as the source of naturally occurring antibiotic substances. The use of higher plants in the treatment of disease is as old as the art of healing itself. Isaiah of Biblical times suggested that a plaster of figs be placed on boils as a treatment of this form of infection. Hyssop and cedarwood were used in the cleansing of lepers. The Orien...
متن کاملRemembering Alan Magill
We note with profound sadness the unexpected death of Alan J. Magill, MD, FASTMH, immediate past-president of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH), on September 19, 2015 outside Seattle. Alan was president of our Society in 2014. He served with distinction, bringing to this elected position his characteristic enthusiasm, optimism, and focus. A noteworthy feature of his ...
متن کاملThe Illusion of Power: Aircraft Carriers and U.S. Military Strategy
"Where are the carriers?" The nation's leaders seem to ask that question whenever a crisis perceived to involve vital U.S. interests develops. According to the conventional wisdom, the aircraft carrier--because of its mobility, its versatility, and the capabilities that it affords the United States, particularly that of projecting air power without relying on overseas bases--is the best militar...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Ui sahak
دوره 24 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015